State v. Kemp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kemp

363 S.W.3d 349, 2011 WL 4944418, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2011

DocketED 95490

StatusPublished

This text of 363 S.W.3d 349 (State v. Kemp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kemp, 363 S.W.3d 349, 2011 WL 4944418, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, John W. Kemp, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). The trial court sentenced the defendant to eight years’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, John W. Kemp, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). The trial court sentenced the defendant to eight years’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 S.W.3d 349, 2011 WL 4944418, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kemp-moctapp-2011.