State v. Kemp

207 So. 3d 389, 2016 La. LEXIS 2464
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. 2016-KK-1370·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

hln these consolidated matters the trial court, after a preliminary hearing, found no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and found probable cause as to defendant Mansion.

The appellate court affirmed the finding of no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and reversed the trial court’s finding of probable cause as to defendant Mansion, thus finding no probable cause existed for the arrest of both defendants.

We reverse and find that probable cause has been shown for the arrest of both defendants, for the reasons assigned by Dysart, J.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CRICHTON, J., dissents and would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kemp, 207 So. 3d 389, 2016 La. LEXIS 2464 (La. 2016).

207 So. 3d 389 (State v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.