State v. Kelsey
51 A. 1109, 65 N.J.L. 680, 36 Vroom 680, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 155
This text of 51 A. 1109 (State v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Kelsey, 51 A. 1109, 65 N.J.L. 680, 36 Vroom 680, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 155 (N.J. 1901).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Chief Justice Magie. 35 Froom 1. .
For affirmance—Depot (Chief Justice), Dixon; Colxins, Fort, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, “Fredenburgh, Voori-iees. 10.
JJor reversal—-None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A. 1109, 65 N.J.L. 680, 36 Vroom 680, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kelsey-nj-1901.