State v. Kelly
This text of 45 P. 38 (State v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny and has appealed to this court. The only point relied upon for reversal is that the court allowed the prosecuting attorney after the jury had been sworn to indorse upon the information the names of two witnesses for the state, who were thereafter permitted to testify in the cause. This point has been expressly passed upon by this court in State v. Bokien, ante, p. 403, contrary to the contention of the appellant, the opinion therein having been filed since this appeal was taken. As we are satisfied with that holding and as it does not appear that the discretion of the court was improperly exercised in this instance, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 P. 38, 14 Wash. 702, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kelly-wash-1896.