State v. Kelly

99 Ohio St. 3d 1549
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Ohio St. 3d 1565
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. 2003-0562·Published

Opinion

Muskingum App. No. CT20020027, 2003-Ohio-337. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained.

It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kelly, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1549 (Ohio 2003).

99 Ohio St. 3d 1549 (State v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.