State v. Kelly

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kelly

190 S.W.3d 631, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 627, 2006 WL 1222743

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2006

DocketWD 65195

StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W.3d 631 (State v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kelly, 190 S.W.3d 631, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 627, 2006 WL 1222743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lori Kelly appeals her conviction following jury trial, as a prior offender, of assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree, § 565.082, RSMo 2000, a class B felony, and sentence of five years. Her sole point on appeal asserts that the trial court plainly erred in sustaining the State’s objection to a portion of defense counsel’s closing argument because such ruling deprived her of due process and a fair trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lori Kelly appeals her conviction following jury trial, as a prior offender, of assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree, § 565.082, RSMo 2000, a class B felony, and sentence of five years. Her sole point on appeal asserts that the trial court plainly erred in sustaining the State’s objection to a portion of defense counsel’s closing argument because such ruling deprived her of due process and a fair trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.W.3d 631, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 627, 2006 WL 1222743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kelly-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack