State v. Kelly

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kelly

990 S.W.2d 655, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 238

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 155 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1999·No. No. 73069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of stealing in excess of $150. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of stealing in excess of $150. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Kelly, 990 S.W.2d 655, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 238 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

990 S.W.2d 655 (State v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.