State v. Kelly

101 S.W. 155, 123 Mo. App. 680, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 361
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 1907·Published

Opinion

ELLISON, J.

The defendant was convicted of the' offense of carrying concealed weapons on his person in Putnam county.

The record presented here fails to show that the State made any proof of venue and that is fatal to the conviction. [State v. McGrath, 73 Mo. 181; State v. Kindrick, 21 Mo. App. 507.]

So it likewise appears, without contradiction, that defendant’s life was threatened repeatedly and to different persons. It was likewise shown that defendant heard of these threats. The evidence conclusively shows that there was a high state of ill-feeling between defendant and the party threatening him. It seems that a defense was made out. [State v. Venable, 117 Mo. App. 501; State v. Casto, 119 Mo. App. 265.]

The judgment is reversed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kelly, 101 S.W. 155, 123 Mo. App. 680, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 361 (Mo. Ct. App. 1907).

101 S.W. 155 (State v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Venable
93 S.W. 356 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
State v. Casto
95 S.W. 961 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
State v. McGrath
73 Mo. 181 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1880)
State v. Kindrick
21 Mo. App. 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)