State v. Kelly James Kloss

2020 WI 26, 939 N.W.2d 564, 390 Wis. 2d 685
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 2020·No. 2018AP000651-CR·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

2020 WI 26

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP651-CR

COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, v. Kelly James Kloss, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at 386 Wis. 2d 314,925 N.W.2d 563 PDC No:2019 WI App 13 - Published

OPINION FILED: March 6, 2020 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: October 14, 2019

SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: St. Croix JUDGE: Eugene D. Harrington

JUSTICES: PER CURIAM.

REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and DANIEL KELLY, JJ., dissent. NOT PARTICIPATING:

ATTORNEYS:

For the plaintiff-respondent-cross petitioner, there were briefs filed by Lisa E.F. Kumfer, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Lisa E.F. Kumfer.

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Steven L. Miller and Miller Appellate Practice, LLC, River Falls. There was an oral argument by Steven L. Miller. 2020 WI 26

NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2018AP651-CR (L.C. No. 2014CF465)

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

State of Wisconsin,

Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, FILED v. MAR 6, 2020 Kelly James Kloss, Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed as

improvidently granted.

¶1 PER CURIAM. Kelly Kloss and the State cross-petitioned

for review of the decision of the court of appeals, State v. Kloss,

2019 WI App 13, 386 Wis. 2d 314, 925 N.W.2d 563. After reviewing

the record and the briefs of both parties, and after hearing oral

arguments, we conclude this matter should be dismissed as

improvidently granted. No. 2018AP651-CR

¶2 By the Court.—The review of the decision of the court of

appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶3 REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and DANIEL KELLY, JJ., dissent.

2 No. 2018AP651-CR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kelly James Kloss, 2020 WI 26, 939 N.W.2d 564, 390 Wis. 2d 685 (Wis. 2020).

2020 WI 26 (State v. Kelly James Kloss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buddy J. Savich v. Chris A. McNicol
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2026
Michael Goeben v. Village of Bellevue
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2025
Mark T. Hodgson v. American Transmission Company LLC
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2024
Amazon Logistics, Inc. v. LIRC
2024 WI 15 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2024)
Renae Wetterling v. Mark Southard, MD
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2023
State v. Daimon Von Jackson, Jr.
2023 WI 37 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2023)
Rachel Slabey v. Dunn County, Wisconsin
2023 WI 2 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2023)
Robert L. Slamka v. General Heating and Air Conditioning
2022 WI 68 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2022)
George Brown v. Cheryl Eplett
48 F.4th 543 (Seventh Circuit, 2022)
Fond du Lac County v. S.N.W.
2021 WI 41 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2021)
Lakeland Area Property Owners Association, U.A. v. Oneida County
2021 WI App 19 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2021)