State v. Kellogg

36 P. 1077, 14 Mont. 451, 1894 Mont. LEXIS 69
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 36 P. 1077 (State v. Kellogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kellogg, 36 P. 1077, 14 Mont. 451, 1894 Mont. LEXIS 69 (Mo. 1894).

Opinion

Pemberton, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the trial court of practicing medicine without a license so to do. The defendant had, before this conviction, been tried by the state board of medical examiners on a charge of unprofessional, immoral, and dishonorable conduct, convicted on said charge by said board, and his license to practice medicine in this state revoked. From the judgment of said board the defendant appealed to the district court, where the judgment of the board was affirmed, and judgment in said court rendered, revoking his license. From the judgment of the district court the defendant appealed to this court. On such appeal this court reversed the judgment of the district court revoking defendant’s license. (State ex rel. Baldwin v. Kellogg, ante, p. 426.) The judgment of conviction in this case was based upon the judgment of the district court in the case of the state board of medical examiners against this defendant, wherein his fícense was revoked, as aforesaid. As the judgment of the district court in said case, revoking defendant’s license, has been reversed the judgment of conviction in this case must necessarily be reversed, for the reason that there is nothing to support it. Judgment reversed.

Reversed,

De Witt, J, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 P. 1077, 14 Mont. 451, 1894 Mont. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kellogg-mont-1894.