State v. Kelley

399 So. 2d 81, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19926
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1981·No. No. 80-2214·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the granting of the motion to suppress the evidence seized at the scene of the arrest of the defendant. Any implication that the defendant could not be prosecuted by reason of the granting of the “motion to suppress the person of the defendant” is unwarranted.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kelley, 399 So. 2d 81, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

399 So. 2d 81 (State v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Circle Finance Co. v. Peacock
399 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)