State v. Keel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Keel

539 S.E.2d 640, 350 N.C. 824, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 986

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedAugust 19, 1999

DocketNo. 134A93-6

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 539 S.E.2d 640 (State v. Keel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Keel, 539 S.E.2d 640, 350 N.C. 824, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 986 (N.C. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

) ) ) ORDER ) )

Upon consideration of defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed 26 July 1999, the following order is entered:

It appears to the Court that (i) on 18 January 1996 the trial court issued an order finding that defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief was procedurally barred; (ii) on 9 May 1996 defendant filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in this Court to review the 18 January 1996 order of the trial court; (iii) on 21 June 1996, the effective date of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f), defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari was pending in this Court; (iv) on 30 July 1996 this Court denied defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari; (v) on 8 May 1998 defendant filed a Motion for Discovery in the trial court, which he amended on 29 June 1999; and (vi) on 16 July 1999 the trial court denied defendant’s Motion for Discovery.

Based on the foregoing and our consideration of defendant’s 26 July 1999 Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the State’s response thereto, the Court concludes that under this Court’s decision in State v. Green, 350 N.C. 400, 514 S.E.2d 724 (1999), defendant would be entitled to discovery pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f); that defendant, by failing to file a motion for post-conviction discovery until almost two years after the effective date of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f), waived any entitlement thereto; and that defendant has shown no basis meriting this Court’s issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to review the trial court’s 16 July 1999 order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction discovery.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 26 July 1999 is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of execution entered by this Court on 3 August 1999 is dissolved.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of August, 1999.

George L. Wainwright, Jr.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

) ) ) ORDER ) )

Upon consideration of defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed 26 July 1999, the following order is entered:

It appears to the Court that (i) on 18 January 1996 the trial court issued an order finding that defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief was procedurally barred; (ii) on 9 May 1996 defendant filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in this Court to review the 18 January 1996 order of the trial court; (iii) on 21 June 1996, the effective date of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f), defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari was pending in this Court; (iv) on 30 July 1996 this Court denied defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari; (v) on 8 May 1998 defendant filed a Motion for Discovery in the trial court, which he amended on 29 June 1999; and (vi) on 16 July 1999 the trial court denied defendant’s Motion for Discovery.

Based on the foregoing and our consideration of defendant’s 26 July 1999 Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the State’s response thereto, the Court concludes that under this Court’s decision in State v. Green, 350 N.C. 400, 514 S.E.2d 724 (1999), defendant would be entitled to discovery pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f); that defendant, by failing to file a motion for post-conviction discovery until almost two years after the effective date of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f), waived any entitlement thereto; and that defendant has shown no basis meriting this Court’s issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to review the trial court’s 16 July 1999 order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction discovery.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 26 July 1999 is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of execution entered by this Court on 3 August 1999 is dissolved.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of August, 1999.

George L. Wainwright, Jr.

For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.E.2d 640, 350 N.C. 824, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-keel-nc-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack