State v. Keegan
This text of 320 A.2d 618 (State v. Keegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE
v.
Russell R. KEEGAN, Jr.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Richard J. Israel, Atty. Gen., Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent.
Nugent & Nugent, J. Joseph Nugent, Jr., Providence, for defendant-petitioner.
ORDER
This is a petition for certiorari. The petitioner has been indicted on a series of related drug charges. He seeks a review of the Superior Court's refusal to dismiss the charges on the grounds that he had been denied his constitutional right to a probable cause hearing in the District Court.
We deny the petition for certiorari. A Grand Jury may indict independent from or in the absence of any prior examination in the District Court. State v. Conti, 110 R.I. 237, 291 A.2d 623 (1972); Burke v. Langlois, 104 R.I. 391, 244 A.2d 593 (1968); State v. Robbins, 42 R.I. 213, 106 A.2d 291 (1919). We have also said that a finding of no probable cause in the District Court will not deprive the Grand Jury of its jurisdiction. Brady v. Langlois, 104 R. I. 301, 243 A.2d 906 (1968); see also, M. A. P. v. Ryan (D.C.App.) 285 A.2d 310 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 A.2d 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-keegan-ri-1974.