State v. Keeble

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Keeble

311 N.W.2d 868, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1481

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 6, 1981

DocketNo. 81-72

StatusPublished

This text of 311 N.W.2d 868 (State v. Keeble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Keeble, 311 N.W.2d 868, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1481 (Mich. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

AMDAHL, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of assault in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.222 (1980) (assault with a dangerous weapon), for his participation in the assault by knife of a pedestrian in Minneapolis on the morning of June 29, 1980. The trial court sentenced defendant to 34 months in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient and that therefore his conviction should be reversed. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence was sufficient to establish that a dangerous weapon was used and that defendant actively and intentionally participated in the assault with that weapon. State v. Garretson, 293 N.W.2d 44 (Minn.1980); State v. Seefeldt, 292 N.W.2d 558 (Minn.1980). We affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMDAHL, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of assault in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.222 (1980) (assault with a dangerous weapon), for his participation in the assault by knife of a pedestrian in Minneapolis on the morning of June 29, 1980. The trial court sentenced defendant to 34 months in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient and that therefore his conviction should be reversed. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence was sufficient to establish that a dangerous weapon was used and that defendant actively and intentionally participated in the assault with that weapon. State v. Garretson, 293 N.W.2d 44 (Minn.1980); State v. Seefeldt, 292 N.W.2d 558 (Minn.1980). We affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 N.W.2d 868, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-keeble-minn-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack