State v. Keahi
This text of State v. Keahi (State v. Keahi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-AUG-2025 08:08 AM Dkt. 61 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL KEAHI, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT LĀHAINĀ DIVISION (CASE NO. 2DTC-22-005318)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)
Defendant-Appellant Paul Keahi (Keahi) appeals from
the "Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment"
(Judgment) entered on January 11, 2023 by the District Court of
the Second Circuit for driving without a valid driver's license
in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes § 286-102 (2020).1
Keahi raises a single argument on appeal,2 contending
that "the State did not meet the burden of showing that the
1 The Honorable Douglas R. Wright presided.
2 We note that the brief does not contain points of error, nor does it state "where in the record the alleged error was objected to or the manner (continued . . .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
officer had probable cause to issue the citation to [Keahi]."
(Formatting altered.) The State responds that Keahi's argument
was waived under Hawaiʻi Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule
12(b)(1). Upon careful review of the record, briefs, and
relevant legal authorities, and having given due consideration
to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties,
we conclude that Keahi's contention is waived.
It appears that the issue of probable cause was not
raised by Keahi prior to trial, and was therefore waived. See
HRPP Rule 12(b)(1) ("The following [motions] must be raised
prior to trial: (1) defenses and objections based on defects in
the institution of the prosecution[.]"). A party's failure to
raise such objections "shall constitute waiver thereof[.]" HRPP
Rule 12(f).
We therefore affirm the Judgment.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 6, 2025.
On the briefs: /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge Steven Slavitt, for Defendant-Appellant. /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge Renee Ishikawa Delizo, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry County of Maui, Associate Judge for Plaintiff-Appellee.
2(. . . continued)
in which the alleged error was brought to the attention of the court," as required under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 28(b)(4).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Keahi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-keahi-hawapp-2025.