State v. Keahi

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 6, 2025
DocketCAAP-23-0000107
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Keahi (State v. Keahi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Keahi, (hawapp 2025).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-AUG-2025 08:08 AM Dkt. 61 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL KEAHI, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT LĀHAINĀ DIVISION (CASE NO. 2DTC-22-005318)

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)

Defendant-Appellant Paul Keahi (Keahi) appeals from

the "Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment"

(Judgment) entered on January 11, 2023 by the District Court of

the Second Circuit for driving without a valid driver's license

in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes § 286-102 (2020).1

Keahi raises a single argument on appeal,2 contending

that "the State did not meet the burden of showing that the

1 The Honorable Douglas R. Wright presided.

2 We note that the brief does not contain points of error, nor does it state "where in the record the alleged error was objected to or the manner (continued . . .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

officer had probable cause to issue the citation to [Keahi]."

(Formatting altered.) The State responds that Keahi's argument

was waived under Hawaiʻi Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule

12(b)(1). Upon careful review of the record, briefs, and

relevant legal authorities, and having given due consideration

to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties,

we conclude that Keahi's contention is waived.

It appears that the issue of probable cause was not

raised by Keahi prior to trial, and was therefore waived. See

HRPP Rule 12(b)(1) ("The following [motions] must be raised

prior to trial: (1) defenses and objections based on defects in

the institution of the prosecution[.]"). A party's failure to

raise such objections "shall constitute waiver thereof[.]" HRPP

Rule 12(f).

We therefore affirm the Judgment.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 6, 2025.

On the briefs: /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge Steven Slavitt, for Defendant-Appellant. /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge Renee Ishikawa Delizo, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry County of Maui, Associate Judge for Plaintiff-Appellee.

2(. . . continued)

in which the alleged error was brought to the attention of the court," as required under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 28(b)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 286-102
Hawaii § 286-102

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Keahi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-keahi-hawapp-2025.