State v. Kay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Kay

92 S.E.2d 667, 244 N.C. 117, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 659

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 9, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E.2d 667 (State v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kay, 92 S.E.2d 667, 244 N.C. 117, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 659 (N.C. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of judgment- appearing in the record, this case will be remanded to Superior Court of Guilford County, High Point Division, for judgment or for correction of the record so as to reveal the actual status of the record. Then defendant may appeal, or proceed otherwise as he may be advised.

Quaere: It appearing upon the face of the record that the affidavit on which warrant was issued was made before “B. Mason, Sgt.,” and that the warrant is signed by “B. Mason, Sgt.”: Is this a valid process?

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In the absence of judgment- appearing in the record, this case will be remanded to Superior Court of Guilford County, High Point Division, for judgment or for correction of the record so as to reveal the actual status of the record. Then defendant may appeal, or proceed otherwise as he may be advised.

Quaere: It appearing upon the face of the record that the affidavit on which warrant was issued was made before “B. Mason, Sgt.,” and that the warrant is signed by “B. Mason, Sgt.”: Is this a valid process?

Remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E.2d 667, 244 N.C. 117, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kay-nc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack