State v. Katz

130 A. 920, 102 N.J.L. 224, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 325
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 19, 1925·Published

Opinion

*225 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Katz, 130 A. 920, 102 N.J.L. 224, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 325 (N.J. 1925).

130 A. 920 (State v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.