State v. Karol

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Karol

312 So. 2d 870, 1975 La. LEXIS 5201

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 29, 1975

DocketNo. 56269

StatusPublished

This text of 312 So. 2d 870 (State v. Karol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Karol, 312 So. 2d 870, 1975 La. LEXIS 5201 (La. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Gene E. Karol applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Elmo Lear, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 12th day of June, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 12th day of June, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Gene E. Karol applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Elmo Lear, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 12th day of June, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 12th day of June, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 So. 2d 870, 1975 La. LEXIS 5201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-karol-la-1975.