State v. Kanter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Kanter

273 So. 2d 772, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1973

DocketNo. 72-182

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 273 So. 2d 772 (State v. Kanter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kanter, 273 So. 2d 772, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and [773]*773which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and [773]*773which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 2d 772, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kanter-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack