State v. Kanter

273 So. 2d 772, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1973·No. No. 72-182·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and [773] which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kanter, 273 So. 2d 772, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

273 So. 2d 772 (State v. Kanter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gutierrez
330 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Iorio v. State
297 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)