State v. Kanstrup

South Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Kanstrup

232 N.W. 91, 57 S.D. 385, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 119

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1930

DocketFile No. 7043

StatusPublished

This text of 232 N.W. 91 (State v. Kanstrup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kanstrup, 232 N.W. 91, 57 S.D. 385, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 119 (S.D. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in the court below (if the crime of perjury, and, from the judgment and a denial of her motion for new trial, she 'has appealed.

The evidence of appellant’s guilt is clear and convincing, and a careful examination of the errors assigned fails to show anything prejudicial to the substantial or constitutional rights of appellant. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in the court below (if the crime of perjury, and, from the judgment and a denial of her motion for new trial, she 'has appealed.

The evidence of appellant’s guilt is clear and convincing, and a careful examination of the errors assigned fails to show anything prejudicial to the substantial or constitutional rights of appellant. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 N.W. 91, 57 S.D. 385, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kanstrup-sd-1930.