State v. Kansco
This text of 179 A.2d 400 (State v. Kansco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to the Reformatory at Bordentown, New Jersey, for a maximum term of nine years. No appeal was taken. Seventeen months later he moved to vacate the sentence as illegal. The trial court denied the application, and defendant appealed to the Appellate Division. We certified the matter before argument there.
Consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of the parties has satisfied us that the application to vacate the sentence is without merit. The order of the trial court is affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weiutraub, and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.2d 400, 37 N.J. 85, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kansco-nj-1962.