State v. Kammer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kammer

860 S.W.2d 26, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1107, 1993 WL 265181

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 20, 1993·No. No. 62631·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of second degree murder and armed criminal action. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of second degree murder and armed criminal action. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Kammer, 860 S.W.2d 26, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1107, 1993 WL 265181 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 26 (State v. Kammer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.