State v. Kam
This text of State v. Kam (State v. Kam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000897 02-APR-2015 07:56 AM
SCWC-12-0000897
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CIERRA ANN M. KAM, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000897; CASE NO. 1DTA-12-00359)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Cierra Ann M. Kam’s
application for writ of certiorari filed on February 19, 2015, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 2, 2015.
Taryn R. Tomasa /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner
Brian R. Vincent /s/ Paula A. Nakayama for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Kam, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kam-haw-2015.