State v. Kalter

848 S.W.2d 646, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1993 WL 73952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kalter. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 600
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 59611·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Kalter, was convicted, after a jury trial, of forcible rape and two counts of forcible sodomy. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment of 45 years, 5 years and life imprisonment.

Defendant appealed to this court and the case was remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State used its peremptory challenges during jury selection to exclude blacks in contravention of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). In all other respects the convictions were affirmed. State v. Kalter, 828 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1992).

On remand, the trial court found the prosecutor’s articulated reasons for the challenged peremptory strikes to be legitimate, race-neutral, and nonpretextual and denied defendant relief. Defendant again appealed to this court.

We have reviewed the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kalter, 848 S.W.2d 646, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1993 WL 73952 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

848 S.W.2d 646 (State v. Kalter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Kalter
828 S.W.2d 690 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)