State v. Kaka
This text of 2013 ND 229 (State v. Kaka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 229
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Soran Kareen Kaka, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130158
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie Ann Lawyer (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent Morrow (on brief), 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Kaka
[¶1] Soran Kareen Kaka appeals from a district court judgment of conviction after a jury trial for burglary and theft of property. Kaka argues the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence, asserting the search warrant authorizing the GPS tracking device to be attached to the vehicle was issued without sufficient probable cause.
[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kaka-nd-2013.