State v. Kaeo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kaeo. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Haw. 451
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 24, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000007·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000007 24-DEC-2013 10:18 AM

SCWC-12-0000007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

PAUL C.K. KAEO,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000007; CR. NO. 09-1-0719)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on November 12, 2013, is hereby accepted and

will be scheduled for oral argument.

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk

regarding scheduling of the oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 24, 2013.

Randall K. Hironaka, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Stephen K. Tsushima, for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kaeo, (haw 2013).

State v. Kaeo (State v. Kaeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.