State v. Kaderbak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Kaderbak

404 So. 2d 189, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21214

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1981·No. No. 80-1072·Published

Opinion

LETTS, Chief Judge.

This cause is reversed upon the authority of our revised opinion in Rizzo v. State ex rel. City of Pompano Beach, 396 So.2d 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).¹

We recognize the perfunctory nature of this reversal, but believe the applicable issues are all adequately discussed in the Rizzo opinion. Accordingly, while we recognize that a complete discussion of the particular facts would be of interest to the individual parties, we are compelled by time constraints to refrain from writing protracted opinions when we are convinced they will add nothing to the body of the law.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LETTS, Chief Judge.

This cause is reversed upon the authority of our revised opinion in Rizzo v. State ex rel. City of Pompano Beach, 396 So.2d 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).¹

We recognize the perfunctory nature of this reversal, but believe the applicable issues are all adequately discussed in the Rizzo opinion. Accordingly, while we recognize that a complete discussion of the particular facts would be of interest to the individual parties, we are compelled by time constraints to refrain from writing protracted opinions when we are convinced they will add nothing to the body of the law.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

State v. Kaderbak, 404 So. 2d 189, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

404 So. 2d 189 (State v. Kaderbak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related