State v. K. Martell
This text of State v. K. Martell (State v. K. Martell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
4 03/02/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0024 DA 21-0024
STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. ORDER
KOBY MARTELL,
Defendant and Appellant.
Self-represented Appellant Koby Martell moves this Court, pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 45, for a subpoena of his former counsel's disciplinary hearing transcript. Martell states that "the Nranscripts from the Discipl i nary Council [a]re very Relevant to Show this High Court that[his counsel's] Perforrnance Fell well below the Standards Required by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution[d- Martell is appealing a November 23, 2020 Order on Defendant's Post-Conviction Filings, issued in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Prairie County. Martell's motion is not well taken. The Montana Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to this Court. M. R. Civ. P. 1. As an appellate court, this Court reviews the record, comprising the original papers and exhibits filed in the District Court. M. R. App. P. 8(1). We review the statement ofissues, facts, and arguments as presented in the filed briefs. M. R. App. P. 9. We do not subpoena records or materials outside of a district court proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Martell's Motion for Subpoena is DENIED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Koby Martell along with a copy ofthis Court's Civil Appellate Handbook. DATED this day of March, 2021. For the Court.
FILED ton fi 9 1r191 Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. K. Martell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-k-martell-mont-2021.