State v. K. C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. K. C.

168 P.3d 1237, 215 Or. App. 291, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1323

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 26, 2007

Docket050666289; A134776

StatusPublished

This text of 168 P.3d 1237 (State v. K. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. K. C., 168 P.3d 1237, 215 Or. App. 291, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1323 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others and is unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain the necessary clear and convincing evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others and is unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain the necessary clear and convincing evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 P.3d 1237, 215 Or. App. 291, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-k-c-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack