State v. K. C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. K. C.

168 P.3d 1237, 215 Or. App. 291, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1323

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 26, 2007·No. 050666289; A134776·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others and is unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain the necessary clear and convincing evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others and is unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain the necessary clear and convincing evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

State v. K. C., 168 P.3d 1237, 215 Or. App. 291, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1323 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

168 P.3d 1237 (State v. K. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related