State v. J.Z.S.

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. J.Z.S.

808 So. 2d 1225, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 111931

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 9, 2001

Docket1991641

StatusPublished

This text of 808 So. 2d 1225 (State v. J.Z.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. J.Z.S., 808 So. 2d 1225, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 111931 (Ala. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J.Z.S., the defendant in an action pending in the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court, peti[1226]*1226tioned the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to transfer that action to the juvenile court. The Court of Criminal Appeals denied the petition. See Ex parte J.Z.S., 808 So.2d 1220 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). J.Z.S. now petitions this Court, pursuant to Rule 21(e)(3), Ala.R.App.P., for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to dismiss the underlying action or to transfer it to the juvenile court. We conclude that the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly addressed the issues J.Z.S. presents, and we adopt that court’s analysis. Accordingly, we deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J.Z.S., the defendant in an action pending in the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court, peti[1226]*1226tioned the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to transfer that action to the juvenile court. The Court of Criminal Appeals denied the petition. See Ex parte J.Z.S., 808 So.2d 1220 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). J.Z.S. now petitions this Court, pursuant to Rule 21(e)(3), Ala.R.App.P., for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to dismiss the underlying action or to transfer it to the juvenile court. We conclude that the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly addressed the issues J.Z.S. presents, and we adopt that court’s analysis. Accordingly, we deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

808 So. 2d 1225, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 111931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jzs-ala-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack