State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

7 La. Ann. 289

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 La. Ann. 434 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1852·Published

Opinion

By the court:

Seideui,, J.

The application does not assert that the applicants have any interest in the property sequestered, beyond the freight, to wit, $156 28; while, on the other hand, some of its allegations are pregnant with the inference that their interest is thus limited. To authorize us to interfere, by mandamus, a clear showing as to our jurisdiction should be made. The present application being unsatisfactory in its averments, is dismissed at the costs of the applicants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court:

Seideui,, J.

The application does not assert that the applicants have any interest in the property sequestered, beyond the freight, to wit, $156 28; while, on the other hand, some of its allegations are pregnant with the inference that their interest is thus limited. To authorize us to interfere, by mandamus, a clear showing as to our jurisdiction should be made. The present application being unsatisfactory in its averments, is dismissed at the costs of the applicants.

State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court, 7 La. Ann. 289 (La. 1852).

Pincite

7 La. Ann. 289 (State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.