State v. Judge of the Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Judge of the Court

6 Rob. 272

DecidedDecember 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rob. 272 (State v. Judge of the Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Judge of the Court, 6 Rob. 272 (La. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.

In July last, the Judge of Probates of the Parish cf St. James, was ordered to show cause on the first day of the November term, why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding him to give judgment on the petition of Joseph Henry Vanderlinden, &c. Our writ appears to have been served on the Judge on the 11th of August last, and he has shown no cause.

It is, therefore, ordered that the rule be made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

In July last, the Judge of Probates of the Parish cf St. James, was ordered to show cause on the first day of the November term, why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding him to give judgment on the petition of Joseph Henry Vanderlinden, &c. Our writ appears to have been served on the Judge on the 11th of August last, and he has shown no cause.

It is, therefore, ordered that the rule be made absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rob. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-judge-of-the-court-la-1843.