State v. . Judd

125 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 831, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 216
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 26, 1924·Published

Opinion

Adams, J.

The defendant moved in this Court for a new trial, on-the ground of newly discovered "evidence; but it has often been held that a new trial will not be awarded in a criminal action on this ground. S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818.

There was sufficient evidence to justify the verdict, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit was properly overruled. S. v. Carlson, 171 N. C., 823.

No particular formula is prescribed for the definition of a reasonable doubt, and no error is pointed out in his Honor’s charge.

We find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Judd, 125 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 831, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 216 (N.C. 1924).

125 S.E. 926 (State v. . Judd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Jenkins
108 S.E. 767 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)