State v. Juanita Jernigan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 23, 2020
Docket05-20-00199-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Juanita Jernigan (State v. Juanita Jernigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Juanita Jernigan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Order entered March 23, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00199-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JUANITA JERNIGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB18-54318-M

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s March 10, 2020 motion to abate the appeal

for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion asserts, and the clerk’s

record on file at the Court confirms, that the State filed a February 14, 2020 request

for findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial court granted Juanita

Jernigan’s motion to suppress. We GRANT the State’s March 10, 2020 motion.

We ORDER the Honorable Pamela Luther, Presiding Judge, County

Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2, Dallas County, to issue, on or before APRIL 20, 2020, findings of fact and conclusions of law. See State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d

667, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006). If necessary, the judge may review the reporter’s record of the

testimony upon which the original ruling was made to refresh her recollection of

the reasons behind such ruling. See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1987).

We ORDER Dallas County Clerk John Warren to file a supplemental

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and conclusions on or before

APRIL 23, 2020.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the

Honorable Pamela Luther, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court of Appeals No.

2, Dallas County; Dallas County Clerk John Warren; and counsel for the parties.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply

with this order. It shall be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed

or when the Court deems it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Wicker v. State
740 S.W.2d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
State v. Elias
339 S.W.3d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Juanita Jernigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-juanita-jernigan-texapp-2020.