State v. Joyce

734 So. 2d 1029, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 230, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 860, 1999 WL 315006
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 20, 1999·No. No. 93,540·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAW, J.

We have for review Joyce v. State, 713 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), based on conflict with State v. Thompson, 735 So.2d 482 (Fla.1999). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Joyce pleaded guilty to numerous criminal charges and was sentenced as an habitual offender. The district court reversed the- sentences because the trial court failed to explain to Joyce that habit-ualization could affect his eligibility for early release. We have since held in Thompson that this is a fact-based issue [1030] regarding the voluntariness of the plea and must be raised in the trial court either in a timely motion to withdraw the plea or in a motion for postconviction relief.

Accordingly, we quash Joyce and remand for further proceedings consistent with Thompson and without prejudice to Joyce’s right to raise this issue in the trial court via postconviction motion.

it is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J, and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Joyce, 734 So. 2d 1029, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 230, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 860, 1999 WL 315006 (Fla. 1999).

734 So. 2d 1029 (State v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peart v. State
756 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)