State v. Joshua
This text of State v. Joshua (State v. Joshua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000800 27-APR-2017 08:58 AM
SCWC-16-0000800
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, By Its Office of Consumer Protection, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
DEBORAH ANN HOKULANI JOSHUA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
and
RONALD R. RABANG and MATTHEW G. AIELLO, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000800; CIVIL NO. 08-1-1-0240)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Nakayama, J., dissenting, with whom Recktenwald, C.J., joins) The application for writ of certiorari, filed on March
14, 2017, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may,
within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of
Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall provide petitioner with information about the Hawai#i
Appellate Pro Bono Program for possible representation solely as
to this certiorari proceeding.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 27, 2017.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Joshua, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-joshua-haw-2017.