State v. Joseph Manuel
This text of State v. Joseph Manuel (State v. Joseph Manuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON
MARCH 1998 SESSION FILED March 26, 1998 JOSEPH TROY MANUEL, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Appellate C ourt Clerk APPELLANT, ) ) No. 02-C-01-9705-CC-00175 ) ) Benton County v. ) ) Honorable Julian P. Guinn, Judge ) ) (Post-Conviction Relief) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) APPELLEE. )
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
Ronald E. Darby John Knox Walkup Attorney at Law Attorney General & Reporter P.O. Box 524 425 Fifth Avenue, North Camden, TN 38320 Nashville, TN 37243-0497
Georgia B. Felner Counsel for the State 425 Fifth Avenue, North Nashville, TN 37243-0493
Robert Gus Radford District Attorney General P.O. Box 686 Huntingdon, TN 38344
Victoria L. DiBonaventura Assistant District Attorney General P.O. Box 94 Paris, TN 38343
OPINION FILED:_____________________________
AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20
Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge OPINION
The appellant, Joseph Troy Manuel (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment
of the trial court dismissing his action for post-conviction relief. In this court, the defendant
contends “the reasonable doubt jury instruction given at the guilt phase of the Defendant’s
trial violate[d] the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution and the law of the land, Article I, Section 8, Constitution of the State of
Tennessee.” After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and
the law governing the issue presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the
judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of
Criminal Appeals.
The appellate courts of this State have upheld the use of a reasonable doubt
instruction like the instruction given in this case. State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722, 734
(Tenn. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1114, 115 S.Ct. 909, 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995);
Pettyjohn v State, 885 S.W.2d 364, 365-66 (Tenn. Crim. App.), per. app. denied (Tenn.
1994); State v. Hallock, 875 S.W.2d 285, 294 (Tenn. Crim. App.), per. app. denied, (Tenn.
1994); see Terry Shannon Kimery v. State, Greene County No. 03-C-01-9512-CC-00412,
1997 WL 31143, slip op. 2-5 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, January 28, 1997), per. app.
denied (Tenn. May 5, 1997).
____________________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
CONCUR:
_______________________________________ GARY R. WADE, JUDGE
______________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Joseph Manuel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-joseph-manuel-tenncrimapp-1998.