State v. Joseph

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Joseph

692 So. 2d 409, 1997 La. LEXIS 1034, 1997 WL 160414

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 4, 1997

DocketNo. 97-KH-0625

StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 409 (State v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Joseph, 692 So. 2d 409, 1997 La. LEXIS 1034, 1997 WL 160414 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Joseph, Herbert; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 36597; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-0247.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed on or about September 1, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the pleading. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Joseph, Herbert; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 36597; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-0247.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed on or about September 1, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the pleading. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 So. 2d 409, 1997 La. LEXIS 1034, 1997 WL 160414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-joseph-la-1997.