State v. Jose G.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Jose G.

931 A.2d 937, 284 Conn. 916, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 427

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jose G.. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 Conn. 331 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 21, 2007·No. SC 17973·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn. App. 748 (AC 24785), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant’s claim about the erroneous admission of extrinsic testimony to establish statements by the victim?”

VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn. App. 748 (AC 24785), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant’s claim about the erroneous admission of extrinsic testimony to establish statements by the victim?”

VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Jose G., 931 A.2d 937, 284 Conn. 916, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 427 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

931 A.2d 937 (State v. Jose G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related