Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. JORGE P.

State v. JORGE P.

19 A.3d 1259, 301 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 4, 2010
DocketSC 18711
StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.3d 1259 (State v. JORGE P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. JORGE P., 19 A.3d 1259, 301 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 484 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 99 (AC 29986), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly found that the defendant’s objection to the admission of expert testimony was unpreserved, and, if not, whether the expert opined on ultimate issues?”
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *913 Decided November 4, 2010 Timothy F. Costello, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jorge P.
4 A.3d 314 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.3d 1259, 301 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jorge-p-conn-2010.