State v. JORGE P.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. JORGE P.

19 A.3d 1259, 301 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 484

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 4, 2010·No. SC 18711·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 99 (AC 29986), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly found that the defendant’s objection to the admission of expert testimony was unpreserved, and, if not, whether the expert opined on ultimate issues?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *913 Decided November 4, 2010 Timothy F. Costello, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 99 (AC 29986), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly found that the defendant’s objection to the admission of expert testimony was unpreserved, and, if not, whether the expert opined on ultimate issues?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *913 Decided November 4, 2010 Timothy F. Costello, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. JORGE P., 19 A.3d 1259, 301 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 484 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

19 A.3d 1259 (State v. JORGE P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related