State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez
This text of State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez (State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42219 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Boise, January 2016 Term Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) 2016 Opinion No. 13 v. ) ) Filed: February 25, 2016 JORGE ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk Defendant-Appellant. ) ) Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, Nez Perce County. Hon. Carl B. Kerrick, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.
_________________________________
PER CURIAM.
Rodriguez makes the same argument as the Appellant in State v. McIntosh, No. 41910 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016); and upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, we affirm the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jorge-enrique-rodriguez-idaho-2016.