State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 2016·No. 42219·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42219

STATE OF IDAHO, )

)

Boise, January 2016 Term

Plaintiff-Respondent, )

)

2016 Opinion No. 13

v. )

)

Filed: February 25, 2016

JORGE ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, )

)

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

Defendant-Appellant. )

)

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, Nez Perce County. Hon. Carl B. Kerrick, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.

PER CURIAM.

Rodriguez makes the same argument as the Appellant in State v. McIntosh, No. 41910 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016); and upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, we affirm the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez, (Idaho 2016).

State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez (State v. Jorge Enrique Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.