Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Jordan

State v. Jordan

805 N.E.2d 542, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1492
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jordan. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Ohio St. 3d 21 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2004·No. 2000-1833·Published

Opinion

Lucas C.P. No. CR982736. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending filing and disposition of his motion for reconsideration and filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted.

[1493]*1493IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed, pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending the final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jordan, 805 N.E.2d 542, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1492 (Ohio 2004).

805 N.E.2d 542 (State v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.