State v. Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jordan

921 S.W.2d 21, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 1996 WL 33910

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 1996

DocketNo. WD 49893

StatusPublished

This text of 921 S.W.2d 21 (State v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jordan, 921 S.W.2d 21, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 1996 WL 33910 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lacy Jordan appeals his conviction of first degree burglary. He asserts that the state did not present sufficient evidence to make a submissible case because it did not establish that he intended to commit a felony when he refused to leave the victim’s house. We disagree and affirm the conviction. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 30.25(b). We have given Jordan and the state a memorandum explaining the basis of our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lacy Jordan appeals his conviction of first degree burglary. He asserts that the state did not present sufficient evidence to make a submissible case because it did not establish that he intended to commit a felony when he refused to leave the victim’s house. We disagree and affirm the conviction. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 30.25(b). We have given Jordan and the state a memorandum explaining the basis of our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 S.W.2d 21, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 1996 WL 33910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jordan-moctapp-1996.