State v. Jordan
This text of 150 A.3d 1150 (State v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jordan-conn-2016.