State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Jordan

150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 4, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 35 , 140 A.3d 421 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 35 , 140 A.3d 421 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"

State v. Jordan, 150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

150 A.3d 1150 (State v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related