State v. Jordan

150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 4, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 A.3d 1150 (State v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jordan, 150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920 (Colo. 2016).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 35 , 140 A.3d 421 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jordan
186 A.3d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.3d 1150, 323 Conn. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jordan-conn-2016.