State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Jones

DecidedMarch 13, 2008

Docket2008-UP-175

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Jones (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brandon Eugene Jones, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
John L. Breeden, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-175
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 13, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Brandon Eugene Jones pled guilty to three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. Jones appeals his concurrent sentences of thirty years on each charge. Jones counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Jones filed a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Jones pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brandon Eugene Jones, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
John L. Breeden, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-175
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 13, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Brandon Eugene Jones pled guilty to three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. Jones appeals his concurrent sentences of thirty years on each charge. Jones counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Jones filed a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Jones pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-scctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack