State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Jones

2 S.C.L. 519

DecidedJuly 1, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.C.L. 519 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, 2 S.C.L. 519 (S.C. Ct. App. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Waties,

before whom the defendants were tried aDd convicted, in his place on the bench, reported to the other Judges, that in his opinion, there was no evidence offered in these cases, sufficient in law to convict either oi the defendants, and so he charged the jury. Hut that such were their prejudices against the defendants, that they con* victed them both, against his opinion and directipn.

Whereupon thg court, upon his report, ordered a new trial, without hearing argument.

Present, Grimice, Waties, Bay, Brevard and Lee, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Waties,

before whom the defendants were tried aDd convicted, in his place on the bench, reported to the other Judges, that in his opinion, there was no evidence offered in these cases, sufficient in law to convict either oi the defendants, and so he charged the jury. Hut that such were their prejudices against the defendants, that they con* victed them both, against his opinion and directipn.

Whereupon thg court, upon his report, ordered a new trial, without hearing argument.

Present, Grimice, Waties, Bay, Brevard and Lee, Judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 S.C.L. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-scctapp-1804.