State v. Jones
This text of 26 S.E. 652 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The appellants, indicted and tried for the murder of Ben Downing, were found guilty of manslaughter, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for five years. A motion for a new trial was made on the ground of after-discovered evidence, and ,was refused on the ground that the evidence alleged to be after-discovered was merely cumulative. The defendants appeal, alleging error in holding that the affidavits contained facts merely cumulative, and in not granting a new trial upon after-discovered evidence. It is well settled that a motion for a new trial, based on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, is addressed to the discretion of the Circuit Judge, and, unless he abuses this discretion, or violates some rule of law, this Court has no authority to interfere. State v. Workman, 15 S. C., 547. A Circuit Judge violates no rule of law in refusing to grant a new trial on merely cumulative evidence. We agree entirely with the Circuit Judge that the evidence offered as after-discovered evidence, was merely cumulative. [332]*332The case discloses no abuse of discretion. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.E. 652, 49 S.C. 330, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-sc-1897.