State v. Jones

147 P.3d 915, 209 Or. App. 351, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 Or. App. 611
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 15, 2006·No. 04-05-1050; A126092·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a police officer’s warrantless entry into defendant’s house. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. In fairness to the trial court, it should be pointed out that Hall had not yet been decided when the court ruled on defendant’s motion, and, under the law at that time, it is debatable whether the court erred. Nevertheless, in light of Hall, it is clear that defendant’s motion should have been granted.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 147 P.3d 915, 209 Or. App. 351, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1777 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

147 P.3d 915 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hall
115 P.3d 908 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)