State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Jones

826 P.2d 17, 111 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 378

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 12, 1992

Docket10 88 06275; CA A61548

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 826 P.2d 17 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, 826 P.2d 17, 111 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 378 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM

Defendant has petitioned for review of our decision. 109 Or App 235, 818 P2d 1286 (1991). Treating the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, we grant reconsideration and withdraw the decision.

On the basis of Wells v. Peterson, 111 Or App 171, 826 P2d 13 (1992), we hold that ORS 161.620 prohibits the imposition of any mandatory prison term on defendant.

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on murder conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant has petitioned for review of our decision. 109 Or App 235, 818 P2d 1286 (1991). Treating the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, we grant reconsideration and withdraw the decision.

On the basis of Wells v. Peterson, 111 Or App 171, 826 P2d 13 (1992), we hold that ORS 161.620 prohibits the imposition of any mandatory prison term on defendant.

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on murder conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 P.2d 17, 111 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-orctapp-1992.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack