State v. Jones
This text of 691 P.2d 830 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his convictions of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.225; 164.405. He contends that the trial court should not have entered separate convictions and separate sentences for the burglary and the robbery. The state confesses error. We agree that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we vacate the robbery conviction.
We have considered defendant’s other assignments and find no error.
Conviction for robbery in the second degree vacated; affirmed as modified; remanded for sentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 P.2d 830, 68 Or. App. 691, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-orctapp-1984.