State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Jones

691 P.2d 830, 68 Or. App. 691, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3665

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Or. App. 157 →

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 20, 1984·No. C83-04-31797; CA A29335·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.225; 164.405. He contends that the trial court should not have entered separate convictions and separate sentences for the burglary and the robbery. The state confesses error. We agree that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we vacate the robbery conviction.

We have considered defendant’s other assignments and find no error.

Conviction for robbery in the second degree vacated; affirmed as modified; remanded for sentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.225; 164.405. He contends that the trial court should not have entered separate convictions and separate sentences for the burglary and the robbery. The state confesses error. We agree that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we vacate the robbery conviction.

We have considered defendant’s other assignments and find no error.

Conviction for robbery in the second degree vacated; affirmed as modified; remanded for sentencing.

State v. Jones, 691 P.2d 830, 68 Or. App. 691, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3665 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

691 P.2d 830 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related